Mit deLuxe
Hyper Poster
Ive been looking at these two coaster closely and I cant choose which one is better? Anybody?
FORUMS - COASTERFORCE
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Chang vs Riddlers Revenge
- Thread starter Mit deLuxe
- Start date
LiveForTheLaunch
CF Legend
They're both amazing looking Stand Up coasters, however I think that Riddler's Revenge looks a little bit better.
First of all, it has more inversions, and inversions are pretty much what Stand Up coasters are made for. It's also faster than Chang, and taller than Chang, be it only a little bit.
However, I think I prefer Chang's colour scheme better. It stands out more and I like where it's situated better.
I think overall they're the two best standup coasters in the world and they both deserve some kind of credit though Riddler's Revenge looks better by a little.
First of all, it has more inversions, and inversions are pretty much what Stand Up coasters are made for. It's also faster than Chang, and taller than Chang, be it only a little bit.
However, I think I prefer Chang's colour scheme better. It stands out more and I like where it's situated better.
I think overall they're the two best standup coasters in the world and they both deserve some kind of credit though Riddler's Revenge looks better by a little.
Rich Bacon
Roller Poster
Ive only ridden Riddlers but I think it looks the better of the two.
Riddlers Revenge has the nicer colour scheme, theming (no horrible unfinished concrete footers like Chang), and layout (why have a turnaround when you can fit in another Dive Loop?), IMO.
Riddlers Revenge has the nicer colour scheme, theming (no horrible unfinished concrete footers like Chang), and layout (why have a turnaround when you can fit in another Dive Loop?), IMO.
Johnny
Hyper Poster
^I've gotta agree about the inversions NOT made for stand-ups argument.
I think the 4 huge consecutive inversions on Riddler's would be a bit much. If I ever heard a park plan to install a stand-up with 7 inversions, I think they'd be being stupid. Even worse if 5 of the inversions were in a row (not all the same obviously).
I think 5 is enough, 3 of which in a row, but because Riddler's still has the better layout in my opinion and the fact it's slightly more compact, I'm still gonna go with Riddler's. The second half looks great with the turns and twists.
I think the 4 huge consecutive inversions on Riddler's would be a bit much. If I ever heard a park plan to install a stand-up with 7 inversions, I think they'd be being stupid. Even worse if 5 of the inversions were in a row (not all the same obviously).
I think 5 is enough, 3 of which in a row, but because Riddler's still has the better layout in my opinion and the fact it's slightly more compact, I'm still gonna go with Riddler's. The second half looks great with the turns and twists.
lakeccrunner
Mega Poster
I think Chang looks pretty amazing...I probably wouldnt like either of them though...too many inversions for a standup, just from my experiences on Mantis, I really dont like some of the inversions on standups...
Snoo
The Legend
Chang, no doubt.
RR is just has too many inversions. Having ridden Mantis, I can only imagine how rough that ride must be. Mantis, as UC said, has a great first half, and Chang has a better second half from what i've heard... so go Chang!
Thank god it got rid of that nasty paintjob too... that was soo bad. lol
RR is just has too many inversions. Having ridden Mantis, I can only imagine how rough that ride must be. Mantis, as UC said, has a great first half, and Chang has a better second half from what i've heard... so go Chang!
Thank god it got rid of that nasty paintjob too... that was soo bad. lol
