|
|
FAQ Search Memberlist Usergroups
Log in
Register
|
| Author |
Message |
|
Posted:
Sun Nov 16, 2008 5:59 pm
|
|
|
100% Goon
Age: 19
Joined: 21 Dec 2007
Posts: 2847
Location: Just outside Bardufoss
|
|
We've known about this for some time now, but no topic as of yet. It started with mystery big-size track showing up at B&M's track plant in Ohio, and ended up being used on this.
http://rcdb.com/m/id4224.htm
If the current stats are correct, "Unknown" will be the tallest Diving Machine in the world, and propably the tallest Floorless coaster in the world as well.
We know that it's going to be red, making this the 6th tallest red coaster in the world (behind Steel Dragon 2000, Eejanaika, Moonsault Scramble, Diamondback and one of the Mr. Freeze models).
To get things in perspective for the British members, it will be four inches taller than PMBO.
To further elongate this post with pointless facts, it will be the tallest coaster in China, snagging the title from Dive Coaster in Chimelong Paradise.
And, as the "Unknown" Mega-Lite and Fireball, the two other coasters at the new park opening in 2009, are in progress (thanks, roomraider), chances are that this has progressed pretty far. Luckily, we've just got a Chinese member, and I hope he and Gavin and anyone else can shed some light on this.
Now discuss. |
Last edited by Pokemaniac on Sun Sep 20, 2009 8:25 am; edited 2 times in total _________________
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Sun Nov 16, 2008 8:36 pm
|
|
|
Goon and a half
Age: 20
Joined: 04 Apr 2005
Posts: 7082
Location: Northampton
|
|
*Sigh*
I wish Dive Machines would stop. They're just not special anymore.
 |
_________________
All Irish men are like heroes, they're descended from poets and Kings. |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Sun Nov 16, 2008 8:43 pm
|
|
|
100% Goon
Age: 19
Joined: 21 Dec 2007
Posts: 2847
Location: Just outside Bardufoss
|
|
^I could say the same about Norwegian Loops (If I interpret your post corrcetly, you're afraid of Oblivion going to Oblivion, right? ), but remember, the GP cares about fun, not "Nah, there are two of those in China already and two in America, I'll rather ride the originals. And I'm tired of DM credits". Besides, they look epic against the sky, and the park will surely rake in visitors on it.
And remember, at the moment only three (or four, depending on how you count Taiwan) countries have Dive Machines. So special, they are indeed. |
_________________
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Sun Nov 16, 2008 8:50 pm
|
|
|
100% Goon
Age: 22
Joined: 04 Apr 2005
Posts: 2437
Location: Georgia
|
|
| I can see where Ben's coming from, though, in terms of layout. They have become rather formulaic lately (station, turn, lift, turn, drop, immelman, curve/helix, brakes, 2nd drop, turn/immelman, water splash, helix, brakes). I would bet that this will be one of something similar as much as I'd like to see different. Even with that kind of a layout, there still is not exactly much you can do with a ride like this. Not like this matters to anyone but enthusiasts... it's just something to note. |
_________________
CC: 236 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Sun Nov 16, 2008 9:37 pm
|
|
|
Plaything of the Mods
Age: 16
Joined: 26 Oct 2008
Posts: 1725
Location: Birmingham, England, UK
|
|
^ You never know, BM might make a monster.
NAAAAAH, no chance. Welcome Sheikra no.5 |
_________________
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Mon Nov 17, 2008 12:53 am
|
|
|
Smooth and Long?
Age: 17
Joined: 24 Oct 2007
Posts: 1567
Location: Dearborn Hts, Michigan
|
|
Dare I start it?
There's plenty you can do with a dive machine that hasn't been done yet. You can do a vertical loop for example. An idea I had was after an immelmann, have the train go right into a dive loop. There's plenty you can do with them, we just need a park to build a unique one. |
_________________
Toro|Maverick|Voyage|DBack|Griffon|TTD|Apollo|RFII|Behemoth|Timbers
Coaster Count: 277
Facebook | Personal Youtube | Twitter | Team 573 Youtube | Team 573 Website |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Mon Nov 17, 2008 2:54 am
|
|
|
Funniest Member 2009
Age: 30
Joined: 06 Apr 2005
Posts: 2465
Location: Wrexham. The arsehole of Wales.
|
|
I'm not sure if I'd trust those stats at the moment to be honest.
I'd say we're more likely to see a clone of Chimlelong's dive machine since Happy Valley really do love their clones. Having said that, Fireball is being built at the same park, and that's an original design.
Thinking about it, that could be good or bad. Good in that they're maybe moving away from clones. Bad in that they have one original design for this park, so why get another?
Either way, and I know I've said this before, Happy Valley Shanghai is shaping up to be the best of the bunch so far. |
_________________
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Mon Nov 17, 2008 5:06 am
|
|
|
Here today, Goon tomorrow
Joined: 11 Feb 2008
Posts: 428
|
|
The difference with Fireball is that its designed under Gravity Group - a firm that "firmly" believes in creating unique and eloquent track designs that not only benefit the park - but benefit the ride in itself. After hearing the story of how their rides came to be from the guys directly it makes perfect sense.
What you need to take notice of is the steelie coasters - especially if you're worried about similar elements to what are seen on sister coasters. I'd be really impressed if a new layout for both the Mega Lite and the Dive Machine came to be - but I'm not holding a candle to my little wish. |
_________________
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Mon Nov 17, 2008 7:13 am
|
|
|
Lurker of the Year 2009
Joined: 25 May 2005
Posts: 5806
|
|
| Quote: | | There's plenty you can do with a dive machine that hasn't been done yet. You can do a vertical loop for example. |
Highly unlikely.
At the heights and speeds these rides are generally built at, it would take up a ton of space - you'd not only need to have the vertical loop there, but you'd need a way for the train to turn around after it.
That's why the immelmans are so popular - they minimize space very well, as they can wrap back out over the drop pullout track (which you CANNOT do with a dive loop).
The problem with machines is the space they take up. You're never really going to have a megalooper dive machine, and until you do have one that's based on inversions (as opposed to the drops), there's really no need for a vertical loop or any other strange element - ESPECIALLY elements that return the train in the same direction of travel as they started in, because it causes the coaster to have a massive footprint.
I suppose one could make an argument to simply shorten the height - but seeing as how the selling point of these rides is their vertical drops - NOT inversions (B&M offer other coaster types for that) - it doesn't make sense to shorten the ride's signiture element in favor of a secondary one. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Tue Nov 18, 2008 4:03 am
|
|
|
Smooth and Long?
Age: 17
Joined: 24 Oct 2007
Posts: 1567
Location: Dearborn Hts, Michigan
|
|
Dive machine a compact roller coaster? You're joking right?
There's no room for imagination with you. Who cares if it hasn't been done? All that's needed is for it to be done. Adding a vertical loop into a turn or immelmann isn't going to stretch the layout that much. Also, what if the park has a skinny, but long footprint in which they want to fill a coaster with? |
_________________
Toro|Maverick|Voyage|DBack|Griffon|TTD|Apollo|RFII|Behemoth|Timbers
Coaster Count: 277
Facebook | Personal Youtube | Twitter | Team 573 Youtube | Team 573 Website |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Tue Nov 18, 2008 5:22 am
|
|
|
Here today, Goon tomorrow
Joined: 11 Feb 2008
Posts: 428
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Tue Nov 18, 2008 5:24 am
|
|
|
Lurker of the Year 2009
Joined: 25 May 2005
Posts: 5806
|
|
Rollerdude, seriously, do you think when you post, or do you just read what I've written and attempt (incredibly vainly, I might add) to just come up with something to counteract it, without any thought as to how I arrived at said conclusions or any logic of your own?
Let's bring you down a few notches, the old fashioned way. Perhaps then, you'll learn to use your head and think instead of opening your mouth and continuing to spew the same filth you've been doing for topics now:
| Quote: | | Dive machine a compact roller coaster? You're joking right? |
Obviously not. Name me one layout that's been done so far that could be considered "spread out" when compared to other "spread out" coasters.
Let's look at each Dive Machine, just to shut you up:
Oblivion: http://www.chrisvaughan.co.uk/altontowers/oblivion/oblivion1.jpg
Drop, pullout, overbank, brakes. Pretty simply and compact to me.
G5: http://www.coasterforce.com/images/g5%201c.jpg
Same layout as Oblivion. Compact.
SheiKra: http://www.rcdb.com/ig2662.htm?picture=69
Yup. Still fairly compact.
Griffon: http://www.johnnyupsidedown.com/new07/gf26a.jpg
The most spread out of the bunch, but still compact - it barely takes up as much space as Alpengeist's first half.
Dive Coaster: http://www.rcdb.com/ig3930.htm?picture=3 (I don't have any better pictures, but it's basically a more compacted SheiKra).
Still compact!
So that takes care of that argument.
| Quote: | | There's no room for imagination with you. |
There most certainly is. It just doesn't stretch to unrealistic ideas that would make RCT players cringe.
| Quote: | | Who cares if it hasn't been done? |
Well, logic for one thing. Given that we've seen quite a few installations thus far, and compact size has ruled them all, I don't see that changing. After all, it isn't like what's been built has been cheap...
| Quote: | | All that's needed is for it to be done. |
Tell that to the parks footing the bills.
SheiKra, in all its compact glory, cost $13.5 million. Griffon cost $15.6 million. These rides are NOT cheap, Rollerdude, and parks are NOT made of money. When you get a Dive Machine, you get it for the drop, and other elements are added on to keep it interesting. There is absolutely NO need to pack on large inversions when it's not the point of the ride to begin with. If you wanted that, you could easily get a megalooper for cheaper.
| Quote: | | Adding a vertical loop into a turn or immelmann isn't going to stretch the layout that much. |
Are you stupid, or just blind? Look at these pictures:
http://www.rcdb.com/ig2662.htm?picture=69
http://www.rcdb.com/ig3631.htm?picture=10
By completing those into full loops and adding the extra pull-out and pull-in to a subsequent dive loop, you're easily doubling the footprint the ride takes up in its first half. Completely unnecessary, given that the point of the ride is the drop - NOT inversions. You're also probably tacking on an extra $2 million or more - all for what? To throw an inversion on there that won't even be the ride's focal point?
Immelmans are only used on Dive Machines because of their excellent ability to change direction very quickly and in a short amount of space. The fact it's an inversion is a bonus, but NOT the main point of the attraction.
Notice where the immelmans are always used - right after the rather large drop, and right after the second drop on Griffon (where it is used to keep the train from going too far out beyond the river - which would incorporate even MORE costs to its $15.6 million price tag).
Seriously, what part of "Inversions are not the point of dive machines, and thus alot of money won't be spent on them" don't you understand?
Once again, parks are not made of money, and these rides ARE NOT cheap.
| Quote: | | Also, what if the park has a skinny, but long footprint in which they want to fill a coaster with? |
Then you probably aren't going to get a Dive Machine, because to build them long would be incorporating a ton of costs that just wouldn't make the ride worth it in the end. Simple.
You're never going to see a megalooper dive machine, and I'll personally be shocked if you ever see anything other than immelmans on them - because inversions aren't the point.
There's not even a marketing trick to be had. What, the world's first vertical loop on a dive machine? Who cares from the GP's perspective? It's not like you have something unique - like a vertical loop on a wooden coaster or anything like that. It's a dive machine. It's marketed for one purpose - the vertical drop.
Finally, to confirm what I'm saying, let's take a look at a couple of park websites:
| BGE's site wrote: | Set amid a French village, Griffon carries riders up 205 feet, then hurtles them 90 degrees straight down at 70 mph. And that’s just the beginning.
Griffon evokes the power and speed of a mythical bird that is part eagle and part lion. It plunges, twists and turns – giving riders an adrenaline-pumping adventure that’s unlike any coaster experience in the world. |
Hmm - I don't see a mention of any INVERSIONS in that description - let alone the fact there are TWO! Even on the ride's specific page, the marketing device used is "90* straight down" and "the world's tallest floorless dive coaster". Hell, even in the ride description page, the immelmans are barely a passing mention! It seems pretty obvious here what the point of Griffon is...
At least BGA bothers to MENTION the immelman in its description of SheiKra:
| BGA wrote: | In 2005, Busch Gardens Africa introduced the world to a one-of-a-kind experience: 200 feet up, 90 degrees straight down. And that was just the beginning. As the nation’s first dive coaster, SheiKra raised the bar with first-of-a-kind elements like a true 90-degree drop, an Immelmann loop and a second vertical dive into an underground tunnel.
Now, technology has raised that bar even higher, introducing SheiKra’s fans to an even greater thrill. In June 2007, Busch Gardens reintroduced SheiKra to the world with a new twist: “floorless” cars that allow riders an unobstructed view of the 70 mph rush.
The name SheiKra evokes the power and speed of an African hawk as it twists and plunges - giving riders a 70 mph, adrenaline-pumping experience like no other. At 200 feet, SheiKra takes the crown as Florida's tallest roller coaster.
Floorless SheiKra: Nothing above you but air. Nothing below you but earth. And like nothing you've ever experienced.
|
Great. So another "barely mentioned," but I see alot of stuff on the vertical drop...hmm...
I think you get the point by now, although based on the way you've "used" your brain for the last few posts I've seen, maybe you haven't...?
The next time you decide to post, take a step back and actually THINK about what it is you're going to write. It might save you some embarassment (such as when you opened your mouth and thought that Mack didn't own Europa...I would've thought that blunder would've taught you something about using your head before you post, but apparently not ).
Real life is NOT RCT. The sooner you accept that, the sooner you'll stop looking like such a fool and you won't be posting about things you clearly have no understanding of with no facts to back yourself up.
Now sit down and let the adults discuss the chinese Dive Machine. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Tue Nov 18, 2008 10:28 am
|
|
|
Here today, Goon tomorrow
Age: 30
Joined: 23 Oct 2006
Posts: 386
Location: Manchester, England
|
|
Yes, well,.. gotta love the squabbling here, heheh.
It will indeed be interesting to see if this DM turns out to the tallest and steals Griffon's record. |
_________________ 09 Trips:- Coming Soon |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Tue Nov 18, 2008 11:21 am
|
|
|
Here today, Goon tomorrow
Joined: 11 Feb 2008
Posts: 428
|
|
What do you mean? Sounds to me like you're posting just for the hell of it - as in just for the sake of typing something...
www.rcdb.com lists the coaster as being 213' 3" tall - which would automatically make it the tallest in the world, second being Griffon (205' 0") and third being SheiKra (204' 0"). And to those who want to challenge the credibility of that information - whens the last time you've seen Duane "make stuff up"? Usually when its posted on RCDB it means it's confirmed based on some sort of factual information. |
_________________
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
| |